AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, Issue 8 1158-1164, Copyright © 1992 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayer, R
Right arrow Articles by Toomey, K E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bayer, R
Right arrow Articles by Toomey, K E
HIV prevention and the two faces of partner notification.

R Bayer and K E Toomey

Columbia University School of Public Health.

In the cases of medical patients with sexually transmitted diseases (particularly those with the human immunodeficiency virus), two distinct approaches exist to notifying sexual and/or needle-sharing partners of possible risk. Each approach has its own history (including unique practical problems of implementation) and provokes its own ethical dilemmas. The first approach--the moral "duty to warn"--arose out of clinical situations in which a physician knew the identity of a person deemed to be at risk. The second approach--that of contact tracing--emerged from sexually transmitted disease control programs in which the clinician typically did not know the identity of those who might have been exposed. Confusion between the two approaches has led many to mistake processes that are fundamentally voluntary as mandatory and those that respect confidentiality as invasive of privacy. In the context of the AIDS epidemic and the vicissitudes of the two approaches, we describe the complex problems of partner notification and underscore the ethical and political contexts within which policy decisions have been made.


Related articles in AJPH:

Colorado's HIV partner notification program.
T M Vernon, E J Mangione, R E Hoffman, N E Spencer, and F C Wolf
AJPH 1993 83: 598. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Acad. PsychiatryHome page
P. S. Appelbaum
Commentary: Legalism, Postmodernism, and the Vicissitudes of Teaching Ethics
Acad Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 28(3): 164 - 167.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JAMAHome page
K. E. Toomey and R. B. Rothenberg
Sex and Cyberspace--Virtual Networks Leading to High-Risk Sex
JAMA, July 26, 2000; 284(4): 485 - 487.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Law Med EthicsHome page
L. H. Margolis
Taking Names: The Ethics of Indirect Recruitment in Research on Sexual Networks
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2000; 28(2): 159 - 164.
[PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
L. O. Gostin, J. W. Ward, and A. C. Baker
National HIV Case Reporting for the United States -- A Defining Moment in the History of the Epidemic
N. Engl. J. Med., October 16, 1997; 337(16): 1162 - 1167.
[Full Text]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
D. P. Johnson, S. B. Gilson, P. M.L. Illingworth, and R. Bayer
AIDS Prevention
N. Engl. J. Med., October 31, 1996; 335(18): 1398 - 1400.
[Full Text]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
R. Bayer
AIDS Prevention -- Sexual Ethics and Responsibility
N. Engl. J. Med., June 6, 1996; 334(23): 1540 - 1542.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Public Health Association