AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, Issue 7 944-954, Copyright © 1992 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wegman, D H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wegman, D H
The potential impact of epidemiology on the prevention of occupational disease.

D H Wegman

Department of Work Environment, College of Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Lowell 01854.

This presentation reviews occupational epidemiology as a foundation for workplace disease prevention activities. By examining descriptive, etiologic and intervention occupational epidemiology studies, a range of opportunities are illustrated where epidemiology has played, or could play a principal role in guiding preventive efforts. Descriptive studies presented include ones based on vital records, on epidemic investigations, cross-sectional surveys, and surveillance. Etiologic studies review the largely successful development of knowledge for lung cancer and asbestos exposure for pulmonary effects of isocyanate exposures. However, attention is also directed to the need for etiologic studies of work environment risks for both cardiovascular and musculoskeletal disease. Finally importance is placed on the too infrequent epidemiologic studies of intervention. Historical examples of control of large risks from nickel cancers and silicosis are balanced with more recent examples of successes at reducing smaller risks of cardiovascular disease and oil acne. Throughout, emphasis is placed on the importance of reintegrating the academic discipline of epidemiology into the application of study findings to prevention of workplace risks.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
C T J Hulshof, J H A M Verbeek, I T J Braam, M Bovenzi, and F J H van Dijk
Evaluation of an occupational health intervention programme on whole-body vibration in forklift truck drivers: a controlled trial
Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2006; 63(7): 461 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
A. D. LaMontagne, J. M. Oakes, and R. N. Lopez Turley
Long-Term Ethylene Oxide Exposure Trends in US Hospitals: Relationship With OSHA Regulatory and Enforcement Actions
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2004; 94(9): 1614 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. Cullinan, S. Tarlo, and B. Nemery
The prevention of occupational asthma
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2003; 22(5): 853 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
D. Stokols, K. R. Pelletier, and J. E. Fielding
The Ecology of Work and Health: Research and Policy Directions for the Promotion of Employee Health
Health Educ Behav, May 1, 1996; 23(2): 137 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Public Health Association