|
|
||||||||
School of Social Administration, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
A survey of 1063 individuals found that when belief in destiny was statistically controlled, differences in seat belt use by race disappeared. Thus, racial differences in seat belt use are statistically accounted for and might be explained by belief in destiny. Efforts to increase seat belt use should target minority groups rather than include them in broadbrush programs. Further, these efforts should take into account this important difference in motivation.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Sternberg, F. E. Munschauer III, S. S. Carrow, and E. Sternberg Faith-placed cardiovascular health promotion: a framework for contextual and organizational factors underlying program success Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2007; 22(5): 619 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Cruz and A. D. Mickalide The National SAFE KIDS Campaign Child Safety Seat Distribution Program: A Strategy for Reaching Low-Income, Underserved, and Culturally Diverse Populations Health Promot Pract, April 1, 2000; 1(2): 148 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |