|
|
||||||||
Food and Drug Administration, Division of Nutrition (HFF-265), Washington, DC 20204.
BACKGROUND. Two types of data may be used to estimate trends in food and nutrient intake by the US population: per capita food supply estimates and survey estimates of individual intake. Because these data vary markedly in measurement goals and methods, we examined whether trends in food supply and survey intake estimates for fat, carbohydrate, and protein are reflective of one another. METHODS. The data selected for comparison included all available survey estimates of mean intake by the US population (i.e., periodic estimates from 1965 to 1988) and all available per capita food supply estimates from a comparable time period (i.e., annual estimates from 1965 to 1985). RESULTS. The two types of data generally did not reflect the same trends. Furthermore, expressing macronutrient levels as percentage of calories rather than in grams affected the trend relationships. CONCLUSIONS. Our findings indicate that caution is needed in the selection and application of available data to estimate trends in macronutrient intake by the US population and in the interpretation of these data with regard to public health research, policies, and programs.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. M Popkin Global nutrition dynamics: the world is shifting rapidly toward a diet linked with noncommunicable diseases. Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2006; 84(2): 289 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Serra-Majem, D MacLean, L Ribas, D Brule, W Sekula, R Prattala, R Garcia-Closas, A Yngve, M Lalonde, and A Petrasovits Comparative analysis of nutrition data from national, household, and individual levels: results from a WHO-CINDI collaborative project in Canada, Finland, Poland, and Spain J. Epidemiol. Community Health, January 1, 2003; 57(1): 74 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Dixon and N. D. Ernst Choose a Diet That Is Low in Saturated Fat and Cholesterol and Moderate in Total Fat: Subtle Changes to a Familiar Message J. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 131(2): 510S - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |