AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, Issue 5 711-718, Copyright © 1992 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, J R
Right arrow Articles by D'Aunno, T A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, J R
Right arrow Articles by D'Aunno, T A
Ownership and performance of outpatient substance abuse treatment centers.

J R Wheeler, H Fadel and T A D'Aunno

School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.

BACKGROUND. Little is known about the organization and performance of outpatient substance abuse treatment (OSAT) centers. We examine several performance measures of OSAT units, including clients treated, services provided, revenue sources, financial performance, and access to care, in relation to ownership of the center. METHODS. Data were drawn from a national random sample of 575 OSAT centers (85.8% response rate) participating in a telephone survey conducted in 1988. Analysis of variance by ownership was conducted on each performance measure, with differences subjected to tests of statistical significance. RESULTS. Descriptive results show that major funding sources differ by ownership. Private for-profit centers generate higher profits, charge higher prices, and achieve higher levels of financial performance than public and not-for-profit centers. Public centers provide better access to care for persons who are unable to pay. CONCLUSIONS. There appear to be substantial and interrelated differences by ownership type in the financing and operation of OSAT units.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
M. Schlesinger and B. H. Gray
How Nonprofits Matter In American Medicine, And What To Do About It
Health Aff., July 1, 2006; 25(4): W287 - W303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
R. Wells, C. H. Lemak, and T. A. D'Aunno
Organizational Survival in the Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Sector, 1988-2000
Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2005; 62(6): 697 - 719.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
C. H. Lemak, J. A. Alexander, and T. A. D'Aunno
Selective Contracting in Managed Care: The Case of Substance Abuse Treatment
Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2001; 58(4): 455 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. Weisner, J. Mertens, S. Parthasarathy, C. Moore, and Y. Lu
Integrating Primary Medical Care With Addiction Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, October 10, 2001; 286(14): 1715 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
J. A. Alexander and C. H. Lemak
Managed Care Penetration in Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment Units
Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 1997; 54(4): 490 - 507.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Public Health Association