AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, Issue 5 669-674, Copyright © 1992 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, M J
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, J M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, M J
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, J M
Barrier contraceptives and sexually transmitted diseases in women: a comparison of female-dependent methods and condoms.

M J Rosenberg, A J Davidson, J H Chen, F N Judson and J M Douglas

Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.

INTRODUCTION. Most efforts at sexually transmitted disease (STD) protection center on condom use, but little is known about how condoms compare with other barrier methods, particularly those controlled by women. METHODS. To evaluate the effect of different barrier contraceptives on the prevalence of STDs and other vaginal infections, we retrospectively studied 5681 visits by women to an urban STD clinic. RESULTS. As compared with women using no contraceptive or with tubal ligations, women using the contraceptive sponge or diaphragm had at least 65% lower rates of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis, while condom users had 34% and 30% lower rates, respectively. For Chlamydia trachomatis, the reduction was 13% among sponge users, 72% among diaphragm users, and 3% among condom users, although these differences were not significant. When compared with women using condoms, women using female-dependent methods (sponge or diaphragm) had significantly lower rates of both gonorrhea and trichomoniasis. Vaginal candidiasis was more common among women using diaphragms but not other barrier methods, while rates of bacterial vaginosis were similar among all groups. CONCLUSIONS. Women using the contraceptive sponge or diaphragm experience protection from STDs to a greater extent than those relying on condoms. Female-dependent barrier contraceptives should receive more attention in STD risk-reduction programs.


Related articles in AJPH:

Barrier contraceptive and sexually transmitted disease study is questioned.
R A Gunn, J R Greenspan, and R T Rolfs
AJPH 1993 83: 1053-1054. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
N Chatterjee, G M M Hosain, and S Williams
Condom use with steady and casual partners in inner city African-American communities.
Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2006; 82(3): 238 - 242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
F Behets, A N. Turner, K Van Damme, N L Rabenja, N Ravelomanana, K Zeller, and J R Rasolofomanana
Acceptability and feasibility of continuous diaphragm use among sex workers in Madagascar
Sex. Transm. Inf., December 1, 2005; 81(6): 472 - 476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
A M Minnis and N S Padian
Effectiveness of female controlled barrier methods in preventing sexually transmitted infections and HIV: current evidence and future research directions
Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2005; 81(3): 193 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
G. Paz-Bailey, E. H. Koumans, M. Sternberg, A. Pierce, J. Papp, E. R. Unger, M. Sawyer, C. M. Black, and L. E. Markowitz
The Effect of Correct and Consistent Condom Use on Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infection Among Urban Adolescents
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2005; 159(6): 536 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
R. B. Ness, H. Randall, H. E. Richter, J. F. Peipert, A. Montagno, D. E. Soper, R. L. Sweet, D. B. Nelson, D. Schubeck, S. L. Hendrix, et al.
Condom Use and the Risk of Recurrent Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, Chronic Pelvic Pain, or Infertility Following an Episode of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2004; 94(8): 1327 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Warner, D. R. Newman, H. D. Austin, M. L. Kamb, J. M. Douglas Jr., C. K. Malotte, J. M. Zenilman, J. Rogers, G. Bolan, M. Fishbein, et al.
Condom Effectiveness for Reducing Transmission of Gonorrhea and Chlamydia: The Importance of Assessing Partner Infection Status
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 159(3): 242 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
B. Donovan
The repertoire of human efforts to avoid sexually transmissible diseases: past and present. Part 2: Strategies used during or after sex
Sex. Transm. Inf., April 1, 2000; 76(2): 88 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of HealthHome page
A.A. Opaneye
Sexually transmitted diseases among women in Coventry
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, February 1, 1997; 117(1): 37 - 40.



Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
N. Redfern-Vance and S. A. Hutchinson
The Process of Developing Personal Sovereignty in Women who Repeatedly Acquire Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Qual Health Res, May 1, 1995; 5(2): 222 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Public Health Association