|
|
||||||||
Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.
INTRODUCTION. Most efforts at sexually transmitted disease (STD) protection center on condom use, but little is known about how condoms compare with other barrier methods, particularly those controlled by women. METHODS. To evaluate the effect of different barrier contraceptives on the prevalence of STDs and other vaginal infections, we retrospectively studied 5681 visits by women to an urban STD clinic. RESULTS. As compared with women using no contraceptive or with tubal ligations, women using the contraceptive sponge or diaphragm had at least 65% lower rates of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Trichomonas vaginalis, while condom users had 34% and 30% lower rates, respectively. For Chlamydia trachomatis, the reduction was 13% among sponge users, 72% among diaphragm users, and 3% among condom users, although these differences were not significant. When compared with women using condoms, women using female-dependent methods (sponge or diaphragm) had significantly lower rates of both gonorrhea and trichomoniasis. Vaginal candidiasis was more common among women using diaphragms but not other barrier methods, while rates of bacterial vaginosis were similar among all groups. CONCLUSIONS. Women using the contraceptive sponge or diaphragm experience protection from STDs to a greater extent than those relying on condoms. Female-dependent barrier contraceptives should receive more attention in STD risk-reduction programs.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N Chatterjee, G M M Hosain, and S Williams Condom use with steady and casual partners in inner city African-American communities. Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2006; 82(3): 238 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Behets, A N. Turner, K Van Damme, N L Rabenja, N Ravelomanana, K Zeller, and J R Rasolofomanana Acceptability and feasibility of continuous diaphragm use among sex workers in Madagascar Sex. Transm. Inf., December 1, 2005; 81(6): 472 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A M Minnis and N S Padian Effectiveness of female controlled barrier methods in preventing sexually transmitted infections and HIV: current evidence and future research directions Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2005; 81(3): 193 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Paz-Bailey, E. H. Koumans, M. Sternberg, A. Pierce, J. Papp, E. R. Unger, M. Sawyer, C. M. Black, and L. E. Markowitz The Effect of Correct and Consistent Condom Use on Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infection Among Urban Adolescents Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2005; 159(6): 536 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Ness, H. Randall, H. E. Richter, J. F. Peipert, A. Montagno, D. E. Soper, R. L. Sweet, D. B. Nelson, D. Schubeck, S. L. Hendrix, et al. Condom Use and the Risk of Recurrent Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, Chronic Pelvic Pain, or Infertility Following an Episode of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Am J Public Health, August 1, 2004; 94(8): 1327 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Warner, D. R. Newman, H. D. Austin, M. L. Kamb, J. M. Douglas Jr., C. K. Malotte, J. M. Zenilman, J. Rogers, G. Bolan, M. Fishbein, et al. Condom Effectiveness for Reducing Transmission of Gonorrhea and Chlamydia: The Importance of Assessing Partner Infection Status Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 159(3): 242 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Donovan The repertoire of human efforts to avoid sexually transmissible diseases: past and present. Part 2: Strategies used during or after sex Sex. Transm. Inf., April 1, 2000; 76(2): 88 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.A. Opaneye Sexually transmitted diseases among women in Coventry The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, February 1, 1997; 117(1): 37 - 40. |
||||
![]() |
N. Redfern-Vance and S. A. Hutchinson The Process of Developing Personal Sovereignty in Women who Repeatedly Acquire Sexually Transmitted Diseases Qual Health Res, May 1, 1995; 5(2): 222 - 236. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |