AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, Issue 4 547-551, Copyright © 1992 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hartgers, C
Right arrow Articles by Coutinho, R A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hartgers, C
Right arrow Articles by Coutinho, R A
HIV prevalence and risk behavior among injecting drug users who participate in "low-threshold" methadone programs in Amsterdam.

C Hartgers, A van den Hoek, P Krijnen and R A Coutinho

Municipal Health Service, Department of Public Health and Environment, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

INTRODUCTION. After the onset of the HIV epidemic, the hope arose that the "harm reduction" approach of the Amsterdam "low-threshold" methadone programs would have a function in controlling the spread of HIV among injecting drug users (IDUs). METHODS. To find evidence for this assumption, 386 IDUs participating in an HIV study between 1985 and 1989 were studied. Long-term regular participants in low-threshold methadone programs were compared with short-term and/or irregular participants. RESULTS. Controlling for possible confounders, long-term regular participants had a slightly increased but not statistically significant risk of being HIV infected. With regard to current drug use, they injected daily and shared needles as often as did short-term and/or irregular participants. CONCLUSIONS. The results suggest that the Amsterdam low-threshold methadone programs fail to diminish HIV risk behavior. If these programs want to have a positive effect on the spread of HIV, expansion of existing HIV prevention efforts, an increase in the daily methadone dose level, and measures to enforce regular attendance may be required.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
S. T Keizer, M. M W Langendam, H. van Deutekom, R. A Coutinho, and E. J C van Ameijden
How does tuberculosis relate to HIV positive and HIV negative drug users?
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, January 1, 2000; 54(1): 64 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. G. Newman, L. G. Selbovitz, L. Zide-Selbovitz, H. N. Blansfield, P. G. O'Connor, P. A. Selwyn, and R. S. Schottenfeld
The Care of Injection-Drug Users with HIV Infection
N. Engl. J. Med., December 29, 1994; 331(26): 1773 - 1774.
[Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
M Farrell, J Ward, R Mattick, W Hall, G V Stimson, D des Jarlais, M Gossop, and J Strang
Fortnightly Review: Methadone maintenance treatment in opiate dependence: a review
BMJ, October 15, 1994; 309(6960): 997 - 1001.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Public Health Association