HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in AJPH Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jackson, C Articles by Fortmann, S P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jackson, C Articles by Fortmann, S P

The Behavioral Risk Factor Survey and the Stanford Five-City Project Survey: a comparison of cardiovascular risk behavior estimates.

C Jackson, D E Jatulis and S P Fortmann

Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Palo Alto, CA 94304-1885.

BACKGROUND. Nearly all state health departments collect Behavioral Risk Factor Survey (BRFS) data, and many report using these data in public health planning. Although the BRFS is widely used, little is known about its measurement properties. This study compares the cardiovascular risk behavior estimates of the BRFS with estimates derived from the physiological and interview data of the Stanford Five-City Project Survey (FCPS). METHOD. The BRFS is a random telephone sample of 1588 adults aged 25 to 64; the FCPS is a random household sample of 1512 adults aged 25 to 64. Both samples were drawn from the same four California communities. RESULTS. The surveys produced comparable estimates for measures of current smoking, number of cigarettes smoked per day, rate of ever being told one has high blood pressure, rate of prescription of blood pressure medications, compliance in taking medications, and mean total cholesterol. Significant differences were found for mean body mass index, rates of obesity, and, in particular, rate of controlled hypertension. CONCLUSIONS. These differences indicate that, for some risk variables, the BRFS has limited utility in assessing public health needs and setting public health objectives. A formal validation study is needed to test all the risk behavior estimates measured by this widely used instrument.

Related articles in AJPH:

Potential bias in cardiovascular risk behavior study.

P Z Siegel and A L Franks
AJPH 1993 83: 771-772. [PDF]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Ezzati, S. Oza, G. Danaei, and C. J.L. Murray Trends and Cardiovascular Mortality Effects of State-Level Blood Pressure and Uncontrolled Hypertension in the United States Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): 905 - 914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-J. Jun, S.V. Subramanian, S. Gortmaker, and I. Kawachi Socioeconomic Disadvantage, Parenting Responsibility, and Women's Smoking in the United States Am J Public Health, December 1, 2004; 94(12): 2170 - 2176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Lopez Urban Sprawl and Risk for Being Overweight or Obese Am J Public Health, September 1, 2004; 94(9): 1574 - 1579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. E. Nelson, E. Powell-Griner, M. Town, and M. G. Kovar A Comparison of National Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Am J Public Health, August 1, 2003; 93(8): 1335 - 1341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Krause, J. Liang, B. A. Shaw, H. Sugisawa, H.-K. Kim, and Y. Sugihara Religion, Death of a Loved One, and Hypertension Among Older Adults in Japan J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., March 1, 2002; 57(2): S96 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. E. Egede and D. Zheng Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Adults With Diabetes: Prevalence and Missed Opportunities for Physician Counseling Arch Intern Med, February 25, 2002; 162(4): 427 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. R Longo, J. C Johnson, R. L Kruse, R. C Brownson, and J. E Hewett A prospective investigation of the impact of smoking bans on tobacco cessation and relapse Tob. Control, September 1, 2001; 10(3): 267 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. S. Harwell, K. Moore, M. Madison, D. Powell-Taylor, P. Lundgren, J. G. Smilie, K. J. Acton, S. D. Helgerson, and D. Gohdes Comparing Self-Reported Measures of Diabetes Care With Similar Measures From a Chart Audit in a Well-Defined Population American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2001; 16(1): 3 - 8. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. B. Fowles, E. Fowler, C. Craft, and C. E. McCoy Comparing Claims Data and Self-Reported Data with the Medical Record for Pap Smear Rates Eval Health Prof, September 1, 1997; 20(3): 324 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF]