HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Davis, M A Articles by Segal, M R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Davis, M A Articles by Segal, M R

Living arrangements and survival among middle-aged and older adults in the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study.

M A Davis, J M Neuhaus, D J Moritz and M R Segal

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0560.

BACKGROUND. There is concern about but little information on how living alone affects the health and survival of older adults. METHODS. We examined the association between living arrangements (living alone, with a spouse, or with someone other than a spouse) and survival among 7651 adults, aged 45 to 74 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I) (1971-1975) and traced at the NHANES I Follow-up Study (1982-1984), to see whether certain sociodemographic factors (race, education, income, and employment), health behaviors (alcohol, smoking, physical activity, and obesity), or chronic medical conditions were influential in the association. RESULTS. We found a stronger association of living arrangements with survival for men than for women, and for middle-aged men than for older men. For men, those living alone and those living with someone other than a spouse were equally disadvantaged in terms of survival. Income, race, employment, and physical activity influenced the association of living arrangements and survival, but their impact varied by age, gender, and living arrangement. CONCLUSION. Living arrangements had a weak impact on survival among men, but had no effect among women.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Nilsson, R. Lund, and K. Avlund Cohabitation Status and Onset of Disability Among Older Danes: Is Social Participation a Possible Mediator? J Aging Health, March 1, 2008; 20(2): 235 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Koskinen, K. Joutsenniemi, T. Martelin, and P. Martikainen Mortality differences according to living arrangements Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1255 - 1264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Joutsenniemi, T. Martelin, P. Martikainen, S. Pirkola, and S. Koskinen Living arrangements and mental health in Finland. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, June 1, 2006; 60(6): 468 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Long, D. Polsky, and J. P. Metlay Changes in Veterans' Use of Outpatient Care From 1992 to 2000 Am J Public Health, December 1, 2005; 95(12): 2246 - 2251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Karnick Feeling Lonely: Theoretical Perspectives Nurs Sci Q, January 1, 2005; 18(1): 7 - 12. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. A. Satariano, T. J. Haight, and I. B. Tager Living Arrangements and Participation in Leisure-Time Physical Activities in an Older Population J Aging Health, November 1, 2002; 14(4): 427 - 451. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. L. Michael, L. F. Berkman, G. A. Colditz, and I. Kawachi Living Arrangements, Social Integration, and Change in Functional Health Status Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2001; 153(2): 123 - 131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Davis, S. P. Murphy, J. M. Neuhaus, L. Gee, and S. S. Quiroga Living Arrangements Affect Dietary Quality for U.S. Adults Aged 50 Years and Older: NHANES III 1988-1994 J. Nutr., September 1, 2000; 130(9): 2256 - 2264. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. H. Ebell, J. A. Kruse, M. Smith, J. Novak, and J. Drader-Wilcox Failure of Three Decision Rules to Predict the Outcome of In-hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Med Decis Making, April 1, 1997; 17(2): 171 - 177. [Abstract] [PDF]