AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, Issue 2 249-251, Copyright © 1992 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gram, I T
Right arrow Articles by Slenker, S E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gram, I T
Right arrow Articles by Slenker, S E
Cancer anxiety and attitudes toward mammography among screening attenders, nonattenders, and women never invited.

I T Gram and S E Slenker

Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromsö, Norway.

A mailed questionnaire survey was conducted among the following groups: 179 women who screened false positive at a free mammography screening; a random sample of 250 women who screened negative; 670 nonattenders of the screening; and a random population sample of 250 women who lived in another city and were not invited, but were otherwise comparable. The most frequently reported reason for nonattendance was not having the opportunity. Furthermore, only 18% of the nonattenders reported anxiety about breast cancer compared with 33% of the population sample (P less than .05). Ninety-nine percent of the women who attended indicated a positive attitude toward mammography that had not been adversely affected by screening experiences.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Med ScreenHome page
I. T Gram and E. Lund
Breast cancer screening programme as setting for an adjunct research project: effect on programme attendance
J Med Screen, March 1, 2008; 15(1): 44 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. G. Elmore, K. Armstrong, C. D. Lehman, and S. W. Fletcher
Screening for Breast Cancer
JAMA, March 9, 2005; 293(10): 1245 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. B. Barton, D. S. Morley, S. Moore, J. D. Allen, K. P. Kleinman, K. M. Emmons, and S. W. Fletcher
Decreasing Women's Anxieties After Abnormal Mammograms: A Controlled Trial
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 7, 2004; 96(7): 529 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Cullen, M. D. Schwartz, W. F. Lawrence, J. V. Selby, and J. S. Mandelblatt
Short-Term Impact of Cancer Prevention and Screening Activities on Quality of Life
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 22(5): 943 - 952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. A. Taylor, S. Halligan, B. P. Saunders, P. Bassett, M. Vance, and C. I. Bartram
Acceptance by Patients of Multidetector CT Colonography Compared with Barium Enema Examinations, Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, and Colonoscopy
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 913 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. R. Andersen, R. Smith, H. Meischke, D. Bowen, and N. Urban
Breast Cancer Worry and Mammography Use by Women with and without a Family History in a Population-based Sample
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2003; 12(4): 314 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Marketing ScienceHome page
B. E. Kahn and M. F. Luce
Understanding High-Stakes Consumer Decisions: Mammography Adherence Following False-Alarm Test Results
Marketing Science, January 1, 2003; 22(3): 393 - 410.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. L. Burman, S. H. Taplin, D. F. Herta, and J. G. Elmore
Effect of False-Positive Mammograms on Interval Breast Cancer Screening in a Health Maintenance Organization
Ann Intern Med, July 6, 1999; 131(1): 1 - 6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
I. T. Gram, E. Funkhouser, and L. Tabar
Moderate Physical Activity in Relation to Mammographic Patterns
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 1999; 8(2): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. G. Elmore, M. B. Barton, V. M. Moceri, S. Polk, P. J. Arena, and S. W. Fletcher
Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast Examinations
N. Engl. J. Med., April 16, 1998; 338(16): 1089 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
E. Lund and I. T. Gram
Response rate according to title and length of questionnaire
Scand J Public Health, April 1, 1998; 26(2): 154 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
V. Pearson and M. Parkinson
Breast screening, health promotion and empowerment: the districts' dilemma
Health Education Journal, January 1, 1994; 53(3): 282 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Public Health Association