HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) A correction has been published Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rigotti, N A Articles by Schelling, T C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rigotti, N A Articles by Schelling, T C

Workplace compliance with a no-smoking law: a randomized community intervention trial.

N A Rigotti, D Bourne, A Rosen, J A Locke and T C Schelling

Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114.

BACKGROUND. Compliance with state and local laws restricting smoking in public places and workplaces has not been systematically evaluated. METHODS. We assessed workplace compliance with a comprehensive no-smoking law adopted in Brookline, Mass, and tested whether mailing information to businesses increased awareness of and compliance with the law. We conducted a random sample telephone survey of 299 businesses (87% response rate). Self-reported compliance was validated by direct observations. RESULTS. One year after its adoption, the law was popular with businesses. The prevalence of smoking restrictions, smoking policies, and no-smoking signs was 80%, 59%, and 40%, respectively. One third of businesses banned smoking. Full compliance with the law was low, however, because few businesses posted a copy of their smoking policy as required. The mailing increased employers' awareness of the law. Employers sent the mailing also reported better compliance, but this was not confirmed by direct observations. CONCLUSIONS. The law was popular and contributed to a high prevalence of workplace smoking restrictions. Different interpretations of the law by policymakers and businesses seemed to explain why formal compliance was low. The mailing increased awareness of, but not compliance with, the law.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. T. Levy and K. B. Friend The effects of clean indoor air laws: what do we know and what do we need to know? Health Educ. Res., October 1, 2003; 18(5): 592 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. T Levy, K. Friend, and E. Polishchuk Effect of clean indoor air laws on smokers: the clean air module of the SimSmoke computer simulation model Tob. Control, December 1, 2001; 10(4): 345 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]