AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, Issue 2 180-184, Copyright © 1992 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Graveley, E A
Right arrow Articles by Littlefield, J H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Graveley, E A
Right arrow Articles by Littlefield, J H
A cost-effectiveness analysis of three staffing models for the delivery of low-risk prenatal care.

E A Graveley and J H Littlefield

University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7948.

BACKGROUND. Health care costs are increasing at more than twice the rate of inflation, thus, public officials are seeking safe and economic methods to deliver quality prenatal care to poor pregnant women. This study was undertaken to determine the relationship between the cost and effectiveness of three prenatal clinic staffing models: physician based, mixed staffing, and clinical nurse specialist with physicians available for consultation. METHODS. Maternal and neonatal physiological outcome data were obtained from the hospital clinical records of 156 women attending these clinics. The women were then interviewed concerning their satisfaction with their prenatal care clinic. The financial officer from each clinic provided data on the clinic staffing costs and hours of service. RESULTS. There were no differences in outcomes for the maternal-neonatal physiological variables, although newborn admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) approached significance among the clinics. The clinic staffed by clinical nurse specialists had the greatest client satisfaction and the lowest cost per visit. CONCLUSIONS. The use of clinical nurse specialists might substantially reduce the cost of providing prenatal care while maintaining quality, and might thereby save valuable resources.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
J. TOKUNAGA and Y. IMANAKA
Influence of length of stay on patient satisfaction with hospital care in Japan
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2002; 14(6): 493 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Public Health Association