AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 82, Issue 11 1506-1512, Copyright © 1992 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biggar, R J
Right arrow Articles by Melbye, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Biggar, R J
Right arrow Articles by Melbye, M
Responses to anonymous questionnaires concerning sexual behavior: a method to examine potential biases.

R J Biggar and M Melbye

AIDS Research, Danish Cancer Registry, Copenhagen.

OBJECTIVES. Low response rates to voluntary surveys raise questions about how representative the responses are. We compared the behavior and attitudes of responders, willing and reluctant, and nonresponders to anonymous questionnaires about behaviors that might expose participants to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). METHODS. Questionnaires were sent to 1080 Danish adults 18 through 59 years including explicit questions about sexual acts and illegal drug use. Identical questionnaires were sent to 3600 other Danes, similarly chosen; packets sent to these persons included cards to be returned separately informing us that they had responded. Questionnaires were sent twice more to nonresponders, who, if they then responded, were considered reluctant responders. One hundred nonresponders were telephoned and asked why they had refused to respond. RESULTS. Enclosing return cards did not affect initial response rate, but prompting boosted replies from 52% to 73%. However, behaviors were generally similar among initial and reluctant responders. One third of nonresponders agreed to respond if we wished (total potential response: 82%). In general, the reasons for nonresponse did not suggest that the life-styles of nonresponders placed them at risk for HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS. This method provides a simple, inexpensive approach to improving response rates and learning about the biases of reluctant responders and nonresponders.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral SciencesHome page
S. R. Wilson, N. L. Brown, C. Mejia, and P. W. Lavori
Effects of Interviewer Characteristics on Reported Sexual Behavior of California Latino Couples
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, February 1, 2002; 24(1): 38 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L.-A. McNutt and R. Lee
Intimate Partner Violence Prevalence Estimation using Telephone Surveys: Understanding the Effect of Nonresponse Bias
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2000; 152(5): 438 - 441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
S. Wacholder
Design issues in case-control studies
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 1995; 4(4): 293 - 309.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Public Health Association