HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in AJPH Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cates, W Articles by Trussell, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cates, W, Jr Articles by Trussell, J

Commentary: the quest for women's prophylactic methods--hopes vs science.

W Cates, Jr, F H Stewart and J Trussell

Epidemiology Program Office, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga. 30333.

The companion article by Rosenberg and Gollub in this issue summarizes data from 10 observational studies and concludes that female-controlled contraceptive methods, under typical conditions, are comparable to condoms in preventing sexually transmitted diseases and should be merchandized as such. While we agree that chemical and mechanical contraceptives provide protection against some sexually transmitted diseases, we think the authors have overstated the scientific case for these methods, especially in comparison with the condom. We think the current data remain inconclusive regarding the absolute protection of spermicides against the human immunodeficiency virus and their level of protection--relative to that of the condom--against other sexually transmitted diseases. Three reasons account for our differences: the limitations in the comparative data; the reported adverse effects of spermicides on vaginal conditions, including genital ulcers; and the relative value of condoms, even under typical conditions, in preventing sexually transmitted diseases. For these reasons, we would currently counsel both women and men who practice high-risk sexual behaviors to use condoms as their first line of defense. If this is unacceptable, the female barriers become a fallback position to protect against bacterial sexually transmitted diseases.

Related articles in AJPH:

The double bind in science policy and the protection of women from HIV infection.

Z A Stein
AJPH 1992 82: 1471-1472. [PDF]  

Changing HIV risk behaviors: the case against pessimism.

C Galavotti and C Beeker
AJPH 1993 83: 1791-1792. [PDF]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Artz, M. Macaluso, J. Kelaghan, H. Austin, M. Fleenor, L. Robey, E. W. Hook III, and I. Brill An Intervention to Promote the Female Condom to Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinic Patients Behav Modif, March 1, 2005; 29(2): 318 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF]