HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Valadez, J J Articles by Weld, L H Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Valadez, J J Articles by Weld, L H

Maternal recall error of child vaccination status in a developing nation.

J J Valadez and L H Weld

In the absence of vaccination card data, Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) managers sometimes ask mothers for their children's vaccination histories. The magnitude of maternal recall error and its potential impact on public health policy has not been investigated. In this study of 1171 Costa Rican mothers, we compare mothers' recall with vaccination card data for their children younger than 3 years. Analyses of vaccination coverage distributions constructed with recall and vaccination-card data show that recall can be used to estimate population coverage. Although the two data sources are correlated (r = .71), the magnitude of their difference can affect the identification of the vaccination status of an individual child. Maternal recall error was greater than two doses 14% of the time. This error is negatively correlated with the number of doses recorded on the vaccination card (r = -.61) and is weakly correlated with the child's age (r = -.35). Mothers tended to remember accurately the vaccination status of children younger than 6 months, but with older children, the larger the number of doses actually received, the more the mother underestimated the number of doses. No other variables explained recall error. Therefore, reliance on maternal recall could lead to revaccinating children who are already protected, leaving a risk those most vulnerable to vaccine-preventable diseases.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. C. Shinall Jr, E. J. Plosa, and K. A. Poehling Validity of Parental Report of Influenza Vaccination in Children 6 to 59 Months of Age Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 120(4): e783 - e787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Suarez, D. M. Simpson, and D. R. Smith Errors and Correlates in Parental Recall of Child Immunizations: Effects on Vaccination Coverage Estimates Pediatrics, May 1, 1997; 99(5): e3 - e3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Ball Toddler Documentation Gap Clinical Pediatrics, January 1, 1995; 34(1): 54 - 56. [PDF]