HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pass, K A Articles by Glebatis, D M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pass, K A Articles by Glebatis, D M

Comparison of newborn screening records and birth certificates to estimate bias in newborn HIV serosurveys.

K A Pass, L M Schedlbauer, P A MacCubbin and D M Glebatis

Implicit in the New York State Newborn HIV Seroprevalence Study is the assumption that newborns of all New York State residents are tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies. We examined this assumption by describing that part of the 1988 New York newborn population not tested in the HIV seroprevalence study and assessing any bias contributed by this group. Of the expected total HIV specimens 1.5 percent were never received by the Newborn Screening Program, 0.5 percent were invalid specimens for which no repeat specimen could be obtained, and 1.7 percent were unsuitable or of insufficient quantity to be tested for HIV antibody. Thus 96.3 percent of all 1988 New York newborns were tested for HIV antibody. Black infants from New York City and low-birthweight infants were represented disproportionately among those not tested. Assignment of all untested newborn to HIV-positive status increased the seroprevalence rate 17 percent (0.64 percent to 0.75 percent).

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. B. Goldstein, D. B. Matchar, J. Hoff-Lindquist, G. P. Samsa, R. D. Horner, and E. J. Kenton III Veterans Administration Acute Stroke (VASt) Study: Lack of Race/Ethnic-Based Differences in Utilization of Stroke-Related Procedures or Services * Diagnostic Disparities: Still Exist? Stroke, April 1, 2003; 34(4): 999 - 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]