AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 81, Issue 8 1023-1028, Copyright © 1991 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hansell, M J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hansell, M J
Sociodemographic factors and the quality of prenatal care.

M J Hansell

School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles.

BACKGROUND: In this study, maternal sociodemographic factors are examined in relationship to the quality of prenatal health services US women receive. METHODS: Data from the 1980 National Natality Survey and 1980 Fetal Mortality Survey were used for the analysis. Indicator variables for prenatal care quality are the percentages of prenatal visits at which blood pressure and urine were tested, the performance of hemoglobin or hematocrit tests, and the presence or absence of advice regarding salt restriction and diuretics usage during pregnancy. RESULTS: Distribution of the basic examinations in prenatal care vary according to marital status, parity, education, and residence in a metropolitan or nonmetropolitan county. The advice received concerning salt and diuretics usage was also influenced by sociodemographic variables. CONCLUSIONS: The analyses reveal that prenatal care is not of even minimally acceptable quality for many women.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
L Shi, J Macinko, B Starfield, J Xu, J Regan, R Politzer, and J Wulu
Primary care, infant mortality, and low birth weight in the states of the USA
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, May 1, 2004; 58(5): 374 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. F. Saftlas, L. M. Koonin, and H. K. Atrash
Racial Disparity in Pregnancy-related Mortality Associated with Livebirth: Can Established Risk Factors Explain It?
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2000; 152(5): 413 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs Sci QHome page
M. A. Hart and S. N. Foster
Self-Care Agency in Two Groups of Pregnant Women
Nurs Sci Q, October 1, 1998; 11(4): 167 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs Sci QHome page
M. A. Hart
Orem's Self-Care Deficit Theory: Research with Pregnant Women
Nurs Sci Q, September 1, 1995; 8(3): 120 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Public Health Association