| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505.
BACKGROUND: The complete and accurate identification of fatal occupational injuries among the US work force is an important first step in developing work injury prevention efforts. Numerous sources of information, such as death certificates, Workers' Compensation files, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) files, medical examiner records, state health and labor department reports, and various combinations of these, have been used to identify cases of work-related fatal injuries. Recent studies have questioned the effectiveness of these sources for identifying such cases. METHODS: At least 10 studies have used multiple sources to define the universe of fatal work injuries within a state and to determine the capture rates, or proportion of the universe identified, by each source. Results of these studies, which are not all available in published literature, are summarized here in a format that allows researchers to readily compare the ascertainment capabilities of the sources. RESULTS: The overall average capture rates of sources were as follows: death certificates, 81%; medical examiner records, 61%; Workers' Compensation reports, 57%; and OSHA reports 32%. Variations by state and value added through the use of multiple sources are presented and discussed. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of 10 state-based studies summarizes the effectiveness of various source documents for capturing cases of fatal occupational injuries to help researchers make informed decisions when designing occupational injury surveillance systems.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R D Comstock, S Mallonee, and F Jordan A comparison of two surveillance systems for deaths related to violent injury Inj. Prev., February 1, 2005; 11(1): 58 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D Loomis, D B Richardson, J F Bena, and A J Bailer Deindustrialisation and the long term decline in fatal occupational injuries Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2004; 61(7): 616 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Horan and S. Mallonee Injury Surveillance Epidemiol. Rev., August 1, 2003; 25(1): 24 - 42. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Driscoll, R Mitchell, J Mandryk, S Healey, L Hendrie, and B Hull Coverage of work related fatalities in Australia by compensation and occupational health and safety agencies Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2003; 60(3): 195 - 200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Loomis, J F Bena, and A J Bailer Diversity of trends in occupational injury mortality in the United States, 1980-96 Inj. Prev., March 1, 2003; 9(1): 9 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A J Taylor, G McGwin Jr, F Valent, and L W Rue III Fatal occupational electrocutions in the United States Inj. Prev., December 1, 2002; 8(4): 306 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Valent, G. McGwin Jr, M. Bovenzi, and F. Barbone Fatal Work-Related Inhalation of Harmful Substances in the United States Chest, March 1, 2002; 121(3): 969 - 975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Loomis, S. H. Wolf, C. W. Runyan, S. W. Marshall, and J. D. Butts Homicide on the Job: Workplace and Community Determinants Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2001; 154(5): 410 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-M Feyer, A M Williamson, N Stout, T Driscoll, H Usher, and J D Langley Comparison of work related fatal injuries in the United States, Australia, and New Zealand: method and overall findings Inj. Prev., March 1, 2001; 7(1): 22 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. R Miller and G. M Waehrer Costs of occupational injuries to teenagers, United States Inj. Prev., September 1, 1998; 4(3): 211 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
