AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 81, Issue 4 466-470, Copyright © 1991 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K W
Right arrow Articles by McKinlay, J B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K W
Right arrow Articles by McKinlay, J B
The validity of health risk appraisals for coronary heart disease: results from a randomized field trial.

K W Smith, S M McKinlay and J B McKinlay

Cambridge Research Center, American Institutes for Research, Watertown, MA.

BACKGROUND: While health risk appraisals (HRAs) are becoming increasingly popular as tools for health assessment and health education, comparatively little is known about the accuracy of these risk estimates. METHODS: A field trial among 732 randomly selected adults ages 25 to 65 years was conducted to assess the validity of the risk scores produced by four widely used HRAs. RESULTS: Self-reported HRA risk scores for cigarette smoking and relative weight were generally accurate, but correlations between physiological measurements and scores for blood pressure, cholesterol, and physical activity were always lower than .51. Correlations between epidemiologic estimates of the probability of CHD death and HRA total risk scores ranged from .13 to .75; partial correlations adjusting for age, race, and gender ranged from .12 to .47. CONCLUSIONS: The HRAs chosen for the field trial exhibited modest correlations with the CHD mortality risk predicted by the epidemiologic model. Mathematical errors made by respondents completing self-scored instruments and lack of knowledge regarding physiologic status decrease the accuracy of HRA risk estimates.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon, P. Pietinen, P. R. Taylor, J. Virtamo, and D. Albanes
Stolzenberg-Solomon et al. Respond to "What Do We Know about Pancreas Cancer?" by Potter
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 1, 2002; 155(9): 796 - 797.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. Ebrahim and G. D. Smith
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of multiple risk factor interventions for preventing coronary heart disease
BMJ, June 7, 1997; 314(7095): 1666 - 1666.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Public Health Association