|
|
||||||||
History and Sociology of Science Department of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6310.
During the past 5 years, the exchange of sterile needles and syringes for dirty injecting equipment has gained increasing acceptance outside the United States as a potential means of reducing the transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among intravenous drug users. This article describes the controversy over attempts to establish a needle and syringe exchange scheme in New York City between 1985 and 1991. The response to a health crisis is used as an indicator of patterns of social and institutional practice. Advocates of needle exchanges had reached a stalemate with the promoters of law enforcement, and the strategic reformulation of the policy problem in terms of the research process seemed to offer a solution. The article discusses the practical limitations on designing and carrying out a controversial health promotion policy; the use (under constraint) of a restrictive research process to constitute--rather than simply to guide or monitor--public policy; and the potential ethical hazards of health professionals' seeking a polemical recourse to the clinical trial. The efforts to establish a needle exchange in New York thus illustrate more general problems for AIDS prevention.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Tempalski, P. L. Flom, S. R. Friedman, D. C. Des Jarlais, J. J. Friedman, C. McKnight, and R. Friedman Social and Political Factors Predicting the Presence of Syringe Exchange Programs in 96 US Metropolitan Areas Am J Public Health, March 1, 2007; 97(3): 437 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vergari Morality Politics and Educational Policy: The Abstinence-Only Sex Education Grant Educational Policy, May 1, 2000; 14(2): 290 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |