HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lindenmayer, J M Articles by Onderdonk, A B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lindenmayer, J M Articles by Onderdonk, A B

Dogs as sentinels for Lyme disease in Massachusetts.

J M Lindenmayer, D Marshall and A B Onderdonk

Department of Comparative Medicine, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, Grafton, MA 01536.

BACKGROUND. An investigation of the relationship between incident human cases of Lyme disease and seroprevalence of antibodies to B. burgdorferi in dogs was undertaken in order to determine whether dogs might serve as sentinels for Lyme disease. METHODS. 3011 canine serum samples were analyzed by ELISA for antibody to B. burgdorferi. Records of incident human cases of Lyme disease were obtained from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. RESULTS. Regression analyses of the relationship between the log10 (mean incidence in people 1985-1989) and canine seroprevalence from July 1988-August 1989 revealed that canine seroprevalence was highly predictive of incidence (R2 = 0.86, p less than .0001). A logistic regression model that incorporates the altitude of the town where each dog was resident, the date of sampling, and information on each dog's age, sex, and breed adequately explained the risk of canine seropositivity. Dogs resident at altitudes less than 200 feet, of sporting or large mixed breeds, and greater than two years of age were five times, four times, and almost three times more likely, respectively, to exhibit seropositivity than were other dogs. CONCLUSIONS. Estimates of the prevalence of antibody to B. burgdorferi in dog populations offers a sensitive, reliable, and convenient measure of the potential risk to people of B. burgdorferi in the environment. Risk factors for canine seropositivity may directly or indirectly illuminate certain aspects of the epidemiology of human Lyme disease.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. A. T. Goossens, A. E. van den Bogaard, and M. K. E. Nohlmans Dogs as Sentinels for Human Lyme Borreliosis in The Netherlands J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2001; 39(3): 844 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				F. T. Liang, R. H. Jacobson, R. K. Straubinger, A. Grooters, and M. T. Philipp Characterization of a Borrelia burgdorferi VlsE Invariable Region Useful in Canine Lyme Disease Serodiagnosis by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay J. Clin. Microbiol., November 1, 2000; 38(11): 4160 - 4166. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. A. Guerra, E. D. Walker, and U. Kitron Quantitative Approach for the Serodiagnosis of Canine Lyme Disease by the Immunoblot Procedure J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 2000; 38(7): 2628 - 2632. [Abstract] [Full Text]