AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 80, Issue 8 921-925, Copyright © 1990 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudolph, L
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudolph, L
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, J
Environmental and biological monitoring for lead exposure in California workplaces.

L Rudolph, D S Sharp, S Samuels, C Perkins and J Rosenberg

California Occupational Health Program.

Patterns of environmental and biological monitoring for lead exposure were surveyed in lead-using industries in California. Employer self-reporting indicates a large proportion of potentially lead-exposed workers have never participated in a monitoring program. Only 2.6 percent of facilities have done environmental monitoring for lead, and only 1.4 percent have routine biological monitoring programs. Monitoring practices vary by size of facility, with higher proportions in industries in which larger facilities predominate. Almost 80 percent of battery manufacturing employees work in job classifications which have been monitored, versus only 1 percent of radiator-repair workers. These findings suggest that laboratory-based surveillance for occupational lead poisoning may seriously underestimate the true number of lead poisoned workers and raise serious questions regarding compliance with key elements of the OSHA Lead Standard.


Related articles in AJPH:

Lead in the modern workplace.
P J Landrigan, E K Silbergeld, J R Froines, and R M Pfeffer
AJPH 1990 80: 907-908. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
D.-U. PARK and N.-W. PAIK
Effect on Blood Lead of Airborne Lead Particles Characterized by Size
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2002; 46(2): 237 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Public Health Association