HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in AJPH Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schwartzbaum, J A Articles by Norton, R W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schwartzbaum, J A Articles by Norton, R W

Physician breach of patient confidentiality among individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection: patterns of decision.

J A Schwartzbaum, J R Wheat and R W Norton

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163.

To determine whether the sex, race, or sexual preference of a patient infected with immunodeficiency virus (HIV) influences a physician's decision to breach patient confidentiality, Tennessee primary care physicians were mailed a questionnaire containing a case study in which an HIV-infected patient presented a risk to a third party. Eight different descriptions of the sex, race, and sexual preference of the hypothetical patient were distributed randomly among the physicians, one description to each physician. The physicians were asked to decide whether to maintain confidentiality, notify the health department, or inform the patient's partner. Responses of 199 White male physicians were analyzed using an unconditional saturated logistic regression model. The odds ratios for these physicians saying they would send the patient's antibody status to the health department extend from 18.4 (95 percent confidence interval: 1.3, 260.1) for Black homosexual males to .5 (95 percent CI: 0, 11.5) for White homosexual females. The odds ratios for White male physicians saying they would inform the patient's partner range from 7.5 (95 percent CI: .8, 69.2) for Black heterosexual males to 1.0 (reference category) for Black homosexual females. The results suggest that when physicians decide to protect a third party by breaching an HIV-infected patient's confidentiality, their decision may be influenced in some cases by the race, sex, and sexual preference of the patient.

Related articles in AJPH:

Confidential reporting by physicians.

T M Vernon
AJPH 1991 81: 931-932. [PDF]  

Reporting for disease control activities.

S Teutsch, R L Berkelman, K E Toomey, and R L Vogt
AJPH 1991 81: 932-933. [PDF]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. E. Kass An Ethics Framework for Public Health Am J Public Health, November 1, 2001; 91(11): 1776 - 1782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Norton, J. Schwartzbaum, and J. Wheat Language Discrimination of General Physicians: FIS Metaphors Used in the AIDS Crisis Communication Research, December 1, 1990; 17(6): 809 - 826. [Abstract]