HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Related articles in AJPH Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Glaser, W A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Glaser, W A

Designing fee schedules by formulae, politics, and negotiations.

W A Glaser

Graduate School of Management, New School for Social Research, New York, NY 10011.

Fee-for-service cannot be used successfully by organized health insurance without a fee schedule. America first tried to pay doctors under Medicare by an involved formula system without a fee schedule, but the effort has failed. The United States has now commissioned a research project to design a unique fee schedule that will precisely reflect physicians' effort and practice costs and that will represent the prices produced by a perfectly competitively market. The primary goal is the same as that pursued recently by reformers in all countries: viz., narrow the spread in fees and income between surgical and cognitive fields. There are serious technical limitations on this effort, despite the talent of the research team. An additional difficulty lies in the nature of the subject: paying the doctor involves conflicts of interest between payers and all doctors as well as among the medical specialties, and the conflicts cannot be resolved by any formulae calculated by any single research team. Methodological and political compromises will be necessary, in order to adopt a reform. The new method may be just as politically driven, complicated, and disputed as the old one, despite America's pretenses that it prefers free markets and opposes excessive government.

Related articles in AJPH:

A critique of the Harvard Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.

L F McMahon, Jr
AJPH 1990 80: 793-798. [Abstract]  

Refinement and expansion of the Harvard Resource-Based Relative Value Scale: the second phase.

E R Becker, D Dunn, P Braun, and W C Hsiao
AJPH 1990 80: 799-803. [Abstract]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				William A. Glaser Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1994; 19(4): 705 - 727. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. R. Oliver Analysis, Advice, and Congressional Leadership: The Physician Payment Review Commission and the Politics of Medicare Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1993; 18(1): 113 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF]