AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 80, Issue 7 799-803, Copyright © 1990 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becker, E R
Right arrow Articles by Hsiao, W C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Becker, E R
Right arrow Articles by Hsiao, W C
Refinement and expansion of the Harvard Resource-Based Relative Value Scale: the second phase.

E R Becker, D Dunn, P Braun and W C Hsiao

Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115.

The Harvard resource-based relative value scale (RBRVS) for physician services has assumed a critical role in physician payment reform. We have demonstrated that the relative resource costs of providing physician services can be defined and measured in a rational and systematic way and that the results are reliable and valid. Consequently, the RBRVS is a viable basis for national payment policy and could be used for establishing a national fee schedule for physician services or to identify "mispriced" physician procedures. Since the release of the final report of the first phase of the Harvard RBRVS study in September of 1988, there has been extensive review, discussion, and criticism of the RBRVS. Dr. Laurence F. McMahon, Jr., in the accompanying article, provides a further critique of our research. In this paper, we review the RBRVS study and results and respond to the major criticisms that have been raised by Dr. McMahon and others. We then describe the tasks we are currently undertaking to expand and validate our research and address the important criticisms and limitations.


Related articles in AJPH:

A critique of the Harvard Resource-Based Relative Value Scale.
L F McMahon, Jr
AJPH 1990 80: 793-798. [Abstract]  

Designing fee schedules by formulae, politics, and negotiations.
W A Glaser
AJPH 1990 80: 804-809. [Abstract]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. J. Jenkins, K. Gauvreau, J. W. Newburger, L. B. Kyn, L. I. Iezzoni, and J. E. Mayer
Validation of relative value scale for congenital heart operations
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 1998; 66(3): 860 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Public Health Association