AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 80, Issue 4 405-410, Copyright © 1990 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, P W
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelley, P W
Right arrow Articles by Burke, D S
Human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity among members of the active duty US Army 1985-89.

P W Kelley, R N Miller, R Pomerantz, F Wann, J F Brundage and D S Burke

Division of Preventive Medicine, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC 20307-5100.

Between October 1985 and June 1989, most active duty US Army soldiers were screened for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody. Of 648,032 screened soldiers in this analysis, 1,588 were HIV-antibody positive. In a multivariate analysis, correlates of positivity included: age [Adjusted Odds Ratios (ref less than 20 years) = 20-24 years, 3.7; 25-29, 9.3; 30-34, 15.7; greater than or equal to 35, 15.9]; being male, [4.2]; being Black or Hispanic (vs white) [3.7 and 3.0, respectively]; being single (vs married) [3.8]; assignment to an HIV endemic location [1.7], and having a medical occupation [2.7, 2.7, and 2.6 for negligible, low, and high blood exposure professions, respectively]. Seropositivity rate ratios for medical vs non-medical personnel were 0.7 [95% CI = 0.4, 1.4] for females and 2.9 [95% CI = 2.5, 3.3] for males. For male medical personnel, being single (vs married) correlated strongly with antibody positivity [prevalence ratio = 3.4, 95% CI = 2.6, 4.6]. Excess HIV risk among medical personnel appeared largely attributable to factors other than occupational exposures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. Michel, C. A. Payne, and L. M. Tierney
Impatient Inpatient Care
N. Engl. J. Med., June 1, 2000; 342(22): 1678 - 1679.
[Full Text]


Home page
CVIHome page
M. Fletcher, M. J. Miguez-Burbano, G. Shor-Posner, V. Lopez, H. Lai, and M. K. Baum
Diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Using an Immunoglobulin E-Based Assay
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., January 1, 2000; 7(1): 55 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Public Health Association