AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 80, Issue 2 146-149, Copyright © 1990 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marquis, G S
Right arrow Articles by Pentafiel, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marquis, G S
Right arrow Articles by Pentafiel, M
Fecal contamination of shanty town toddlers in households with non-corralled poultry, Lima, Peru.

G S Marquis, G Ventura, R H Gilman, E Porras, E Miranda, L Carbajal and M Pentafiel

Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.

We used direct observer techniques to measure the frequency with which toddler-aged children were contaminated by poultry feces in homes in a peri-urban shanty town in Lima, Peru. The mean number of fowl was 5.4 (SD 3.1), with 10.0 (SD 10.7) poultry defecations per 12 hours. Toddlers' hand contact with poultry feces occurred a mean of 2.9 (SD 3.0) times/12 hours. A mean of 3.9 (SD 4.6) feces-to-mouth episodes per household/12 hours occurred both by direct hand-to-mouth contamination and indirectly by handling soiled objects which were then placed in the mouth. There was a strong correlation between feces-to-hand contamination and feces-to-mouth contamination (r = 0.94). There was also an association between feces-to-mouth contamination and the number of stools deposited in the house (r = 0.66). For each additional chicken stool deposited during the day, there was an average increase of 0.27 in feces-to-mouth episodes. We collected feces from 68 infected chickens and found viable Campylobacter jejuni for up to 48 hours after deposition. Yet, a survey of 108 families demonstrated that free-roaming poultry were often not thought of as a health risk for children. An intervention program to reduce oral-fecal contamination should emphasize that all poultry be corralled and not allowed access into the house.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
R. A. OBERHELMAN, R. H. GILMAN, P. SHEEN, J. CORDOVA, M. ZIMIC, L. CABRERA, R. MEZA, and J. PEREZ
AN INTERVENTION-CONTROL STUDY OF CORRALLING OF FREE-RANGING CHICKENS TO CONTROL CAMPYLOBACTER INFECTIONS AMONG CHILDREN IN A PERUVIAN PERIURBAN SHANTYTOWN
Am J Trop Med Hyg, June 1, 2006; 74(6): 1054 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. R. Rao, A. B. Naficy, S. J. Savarino, R. Abu-Elyazeed, T. F. Wierzba, L. F. Peruski, I. Abdel-Messih, R. Frenck, and J. D. Clemens
Pathogenicity and Convalescent Excretion of Campylobacter in Rural Egyptian Children
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2001; 154(2): 166 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Public Health Association