AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 80, Issue 11 1343-1348, Copyright © 1990 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diehr, P
Right arrow Articles by Grembowski, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diehr, P
Right arrow Articles by Grembowski, D
A small area simulation approach to determining excess variation in dental procedure rates.

P Diehr and D Grembowski

Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

All small area analyses need to compare the observed variability in rates to that expected by chance alone, but the expected variability is usually not known. This paper uses patient-level data for five dental procedures to simulate the distributions of the summary statistics that are usually generated in such studies. These statistics are found to vary greatly even under the "null hypothesis" that all dentists are using procedures at the same rates. The simulated dentist rates are compared to observed rates obtained in a different study. These findings illustrate problems that can occur in small area analysis studies, and emphasize the importance of using statistical techniques that are appropriate for the data that are to be analyzed. Investigators should make every effort to obtain patient-level data, or at least to understand the underlying distribution of the number of procedures per patient, to avoid mistaking significant deviations from an incorrect model as evidence for significant variation among small areas.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
J. L. KOLKER, P. C. DAMIANO, D. J. CAPLAN, S. R. ARMSTRONG, D. V. DAWSON, M. P. JONES, S. D. FLACH, J. J. WARREN, and R. A. KUTHY
Teeth with large amalgam restorations and crowns: Factors affecting the receipt of subsequent treatment after 10 years
J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2005; 136(6): 738 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
T. To, A. Wajja, P. W. Wales, and J. C. Langer
Population Demographic Indicators Associated With Incidence of Pyloric Stenosis
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, June 1, 2005; 159(6): 520 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
T. Love, A. C Dowell, C. Salmond, and P. Crampton
Quality indicators and variation in primary care: modelling GP referral patterns
Fam. Pract., April 1, 2004; 21(2): 160 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stat Methods Med ResHome page
T. To, J I. Williams, K. Wu, M.-E. Theriault, and V. Goel
Comparison of methods to identify outliers observed in health services small area variation studies
Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 2003; 12(6): 531 - 546.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Public Health Association