AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 80, Issue 11 1338-1342, Copyright © 1990 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, H L
Right arrow Articles by Pratts, C I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, H L
Right arrow Articles by Pratts, C I
Epidemiologic differences between chlamydia and gonorrhea.

H L Zimmerman, J J Potterat, R L Dukes, J B Muth, H P Zimmerman, J S Fogle and C I Pratts

El Paso County Health Department, Colorado Springs, CO 80909.

To assess the prevalence, demographics, and transmission patterns of genital chlamydia infection, we screened 3,078 patients, and compared identified cases (N = 511) to gonorrhea cases (N = 291) diagnosed in the same setting. Chlamydia cases were younger and more likely to be White than their gonorrhea counterparts. Chlamydia cases were distributed diffusely; geographic overlap between the two diseases was only about 40 percent. Gonococcal coinfection was noted in less than 10 percent of patients with chlamydia. Nearly half of men with chlamydia and four-fifths of women were asymptomatic and most cases were identified through screening or contact tracing. Populations at high risk for chlamydia are seemingly different from those for gonorrhea. Differences may be due to control interventions (active for gonorrhea, passive for chlamydia). Chlamydia case reporting and control initiatives are recommended.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
R. P. Kerani, M. S. Handcock, H. H. Handsfield, and K. K. Holmes
Comparative Geographic Concentrations of 4 Sexually Transmitted Infections
Am J Public Health, February 1, 2005; 95(2): 324 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
E F Monteiro, C J N Lacey, and D Merrick
The interrelation of demographic and geospatial risk factors between four common sexually transmitted diseases
Sex. Transm. Inf., February 1, 2005; 81(1): 41 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
D C G Law, M L Serre, G Christakos, P A Leone, and W C Miller
Spatial analysis and mapping of sexually transmitted diseases to optimise intervention and prevention strategies
Sex. Transm. Inf., August 1, 2004; 80(4): 294 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
C A M McNulty, E Freeman, J Bowen, J Shefras, and K A Fenton
Diagnosis of genital chlamydia in primary care: an explanation of reasons for variation in chlamydia testing
Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2004; 80(3): 207 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
Y. Pannekoek, S. M. Westenberg, P. P. Eijk, S. Repping, F. van der Veen, A. van der Ende, and J. Dankert
Assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection of semen specimens by ligase chain reaction
J. Med. Microbiol., September 1, 2003; 52(9): 777 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
J J Potterat, S Q Muth, R B Rothenberg, H Zimmerman-Rogers, D L Green, J E Taylor, M S Bonney, and H A White
Sexual network structure as an indicator of epidemic phase
Sex. Transm. Inf., April 1, 2002; 78(90001): i152 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
B. Duncan, G. Hart, and A. Scoular
Screening and the Construction of Scepticism: The Case of Chlamydia
Health (London) , April 1, 2001; 5(2): 165 - 185.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
N. Low, J. A C Sterne, and D. Barlow
Inequalities in rates of gonorrhoea and chlamydia between black ethnic groups in south east London: cross sectional study
Sex. Transm. Inf., February 1, 2001; 77(1): 15 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
Y. Pannekoek, S. M. Westenberg, J. de Vries, S. Repping, L. Spanjaard, P. P. Eijk, A. van der Ende, and J. Dankert
PCR Assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection of Semen Specimens Processed for Artificial Insemination
J. Clin. Microbiol., October 1, 2000; 38(10): 3763 - 3767.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
F. M. Biro, S. L. Rosenthal, and M. Kiniyalocts
Gonococcal and Chlamydial Genitourinary Infections in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Adolescent Women
Clinical Pediatrics, August 1, 1995; 34(8): 419 - 423.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
N. Redfern-Vance and S. A. Hutchinson
The Process of Developing Personal Sovereignty in Women who Repeatedly Acquire Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Qual Health Res, May 1, 1995; 5(2): 222 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Public Health Association