AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 79, Issue 9 1289-1294, Copyright © 1989 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Browner, W S
Right arrow Articles by Newman, T B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Browner, W S
Right arrow Articles by Newman, T B
Sample size and power based on the population attributable fraction.

W S Browner and T B Newman

Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Francisco 94121.

Most methods for calculating sample size use the relative risk (RR) to indicate the strength of the association between exposure and disease. For measuring the public health importance of a possible association, the population attributable fraction (PAF)--the proportion of disease incidence in a population that is attributable to an exposure--is more appropriate. We determined sample size and power for detecting a specified PAF in both cohort and case-control studies and compared the results with those obtained using conventional estimates based on the relative risk. When an exposure is rare, a study that has little power to detect a small RR often has adequate power to detect a small PAF. On the other hand, for common exposures, even a relatively large study may have inadequate power to detect a small PAF. These comparisons emphasize the importance of selecting the most pertinent measure of association, either relative risk or population attributable fraction, when calculating power and sample size.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Hoppe, W. Klitz, K. D'Harlingue, S. Cheng, M. Grow, L. Steiner, J. Noble, R. Adams, L. Styles, and for the Stroke Prevention Trial in Sickle Cell Ane
Confirmation of an Association Between the TNF( 308) Promoter Polymorphism and Stroke Risk in Children With Sickle Cell Anemia
Stroke, August 1, 2007; 38(8): 2241 - 2246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Public Health Association