AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 79, Issue 5 613-618, Copyright © 1989 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, B S
Right arrow Articles by Barker, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, B S
Right arrow Articles by Barker, S
Olfactory function in chemical workers exposed to acrylate and methacrylate vapors.

B S Schwartz, R L Doty, C Monroe, R Frye and S Barker

Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.

An investigation of the olfactory function of 731 workers at a chemical facility which manufacturers acrylates and methacrylates was undertaken using a standardized quantitative test. In a cross-sectional analysis of the data, no associations of chemical exposure with olfactory test scores were observed. A nested case-control study designed to evaluate the cumulative effects of exposure on olfactory function, however, revealed elevated crude exposure odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of 2.0 (1.1, 3.8) for all workers and 6.0 (1.7, 21.5) for workers who never smoked cigarettes. Logistic regression analysis, adjusting for multiple confounders, revealed exposure odds ratios of 2.8 (1.1, 7.0) and 13.5 (2.1, 87.6) in these same groups, respectively, and a dose-response relationship between olfactory dysfunction and cumulative exposure scores--semi-quantitative indices of lifetime exposure to the acrylates. The data also revealed decreasing exposure odds ratios with increasing duration since last exposure to these chemicals, suggesting that the effects may be reversible.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. B. Antunes, R. Bowler, and R. L. Doty
San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge Welder Study: Olfactory function
Neurology, September 18, 2007; 69(12): 1278 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
S. H. Gaffney and D. J. Paustenbach
A Proposed Approach for Setting Occupational Exposure Limits for Sensory Irritants Based on Chemosensory Models
Ann. Hyg., June 30, 2007; (2007) mem019v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
E. M. Zibrowski and J. McD. Robertson
Olfactory sensitivity in medical laboratory workers occupationally exposed to organic solvent mixtures
Occup. Med., January 1, 2006; 56(1): 51 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
R. Hudson, A. Arriola, M. Martinez-Gomez, and H. Distel
Effect of Air Pollution on Olfactory Function in Residents of Mexico City
Chem Senses, January 1, 2006; 31(1): 79 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Chem SensesHome page
E. S. Choudhury, P. Moberg, and R. L. Doty
Influences of Age and Sex on a Microencapsulated Odor Memory Test
Chem Senses, November 1, 2003; 28(9): 799 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Public Health Association