AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 79, Issue 5 591-594, Copyright © 1989 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiecha, J L
Right arrow Articles by Palombo, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiecha, J L
Right arrow Articles by Palombo, R
Multiple program participation: comparison of nutrition and food assistance program benefits with food costs in Boston, Massachusetts.

J L Wiecha and R Palombo

Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston 02111.

The values of government cash and food assistance benefits are compared to estimated food costs in Boston for households whose sole source of income is Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) and who have housing in the private sector. Methods developed by the General Accounting Office (GAO) in 1978 are replicated. GAO found that the value of combined benefits can exceed the cost of the United States Department of Agriculture's Thrifty Food Plan. Key assumptions underlying GAO's methodology are challenged, and an alternate method is applied. The new results contradict GAO's conclusions and suggest that Boston food costs exceed the combined value of benefits that AFDC households may receive, although participation in multiple food assistance programs is more beneficial than receipt of benefits from single programs. The authors conclude that food stamps and AFDC benefits indexed to actual costs of living are needed to meet the food needs of low-income families in Boston.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Drewnowski and S. Specter
Poverty and obesity: the role of energy density and energy costs
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2004; 79(1): 6 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
H. DUBOWITZ, M. BLACK, R. H. STARR Jr., and S. ZURAVIN
A Conceptual Definition of Child Neglect
Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 1993; 20(1): 8 - 26.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Public Health Association