AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 79, Issue 1 62-64, Copyright © 1989 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, C L
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, C L
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S
Barriers to implementation of a prenatal care program for low income women.

C L Miller, L H Margolis, B Schwethelm and S Smith

Department of Public Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Michigan.

By the middle of the second year of the Michigan Prenatal/Postpartum Care (PPC) program to provide pregnancy-related services to low income women who were ineligible for Medicaid or other insurance, only 25 per cent of the participating health departments were enrolling greater than 90 per cent of contracted potential clients. Using a survey of program directors and relevant state documents, we identified several barriers to successful implementation: institutional (program complexity, high levels of administrative concerns along with low levels of communication between local health departments and providers); economic (inadequate resources for provider reimbursement, outreach, transportation, high-risk pregnancies, or administrative overhead); psychological (servicing populations with multiple and hard to care for problems, potential discomfort of low income women with traditional providers); and informational (insufficient information about the program infiltrating the target community).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. C. McCormick, L. W. Deal, B. L. Devaney, D. Chu, L. Moreno, and K. T. Raykovich
The Impact on Clients of a Community-Based Infant Mortality Reduction Program: The National Healthy Start Program Survey of Postpartum Women
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2001; 91(12): 1975 - 1977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
G. Berkowitz, C. Brindis, and Z. Clayson
Using a Multimethod Approach to Measure Success in Perinatal Drug Treatment
Eval Health Prof, March 1, 1996; 19(1): 48 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Public Health Association