AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 78, Issue 9 1161-1169, Copyright © 1988 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in AJPH
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butter, I H
Right arrow Articles by Kay, B J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Butter, I H
Right arrow Articles by Kay, B J
State laws and the practice of lay midwifery.

I H Butter and B J Kay

Department of Public Health Policy and Administration, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.

A national survey was conducted to assess the current status and characteristics of state legislation regulating the practice of lay midwives. As of July 1987, 10 states have prohibitory laws, five states have grandmother clauses authorizing practicing midwives under repealed statutes, five states have enabling laws which are not used, and 10 states explicitly permit lay midwives to practice. In the 21 remaining states, the legal status of midwives is unclear. Much of the enabling legislation restricts midwifery practice often resulting in situations similar to those in states with prohibitory laws. Given the growth of an extensive grassroots movement of lay midwives committed to quality of care, this outcome suggests that 21 states with no legislation may provide better opportunities for midwifery practice than states with enabling laws.


Related articles in AJPH:

Opportunities for lay midwifery practice.
P M Starzyk
AJPH 1989 79: 520-521. [PDF]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. Hafner-Eaton and L. K. Pearce
Birth Choices, the Law, and Medicine: Balancing Individual Freedoms and Protection of the Public's Health
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1994; 19(4): 813 - 835.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Work and OccupationsHome page
B. RUSHING
Ideology in the Reemergence of North American Midwifery
Work and Occupations, February 1, 1993; 20(1): 46 - 67.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Public Health Association