|
|
||||||||
Department of Public Health Policy and Administration, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.
A national survey was conducted to assess the current status and characteristics of state legislation regulating the practice of lay midwives. As of July 1987, 10 states have prohibitory laws, five states have grandmother clauses authorizing practicing midwives under repealed statutes, five states have enabling laws which are not used, and 10 states explicitly permit lay midwives to practice. In the 21 remaining states, the legal status of midwives is unclear. Much of the enabling legislation restricts midwifery practice often resulting in situations similar to those in states with prohibitory laws. Given the growth of an extensive grassroots movement of lay midwives committed to quality of care, this outcome suggests that 21 states with no legislation may provide better opportunities for midwifery practice than states with enabling laws.
Related articles in AJPH:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Hafner-Eaton and L. K. Pearce Birth Choices, the Law, and Medicine: Balancing Individual Freedoms and Protection of the Public's Health Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1994; 19(4): 813 - 835. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. RUSHING Ideology in the Reemergence of North American Midwifery Work and Occupations, February 1, 1993; 20(1): 46 - 67. [Abstract] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |