AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 78, Issue 7 796-800, Copyright © 1988 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, N D
Right arrow Articles by Sandman, P M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, N D
Right arrow Articles by Sandman, P M
Optimistic biases in public perceptions of the risk from radon.

N D Weinstein, M L Klotz and P M Sandman

Department of Human Ecology, Cook College, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903.

Survey data were obtained from a random sample of 657 homeowners in New Jersey and also from 141 homeowners who had already monitored their homes for radon. People who had not tested tended to believe that they were less at risk than their neighbors, and they interpreted ambiguous predictors of home radon levels in ways that supported their beliefs of below-average risk. Residents who had already tested their homes were relatively accurate about the probability of health effects. In both groups less than half of those who knew that radon can cause lung cancer were willing to admit that it would be serious if they suffered health effects from this source. The optimistic biases of the public may hamper attempts to encourage home radon monitoring and to promote appropriate mitigation measures in homes with elevated radon concentrations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. W. Field
Three Mile Island epidemiologic radiation dose assessment revisited: 25 years after the accident
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 18, 2005; 113(2): 214 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Environment and BehaviorHome page
B. L. Williams, S. Brown, and M. Greenberg
Determinants of Trust Perceptions among Residents Surrounding the Savannah River Nuclear Weapons Site
Environment and Behavior, May 1, 1999; 31(3): 354 - 371.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ BehavHome page
P. M. Sandman and N. D. Weinstein
Predictors of Home Radon Testing and Implications for Testing Promotion Programs
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 1993; 20(4): 471 - 487.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Med Decis MakingHome page
D. J. Mazur and D. H. Hickam
Patients' and Physicians' Interpretations of Graphic Data Displays
Med Decis Making, February 1, 1993; 13(1): 59 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Health Educ BehavHome page
C. J. Kennedy, C. K. Probart, and S. M. Dorman
The Relationship between Radon Knowledge, Concern and Behavior, and Health Values, Health Locus of Control and Preventive Health Behaviors
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 1991; 18(3): 319 - 329.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
N. Weinstein
Optimistic biases about personal risks
Science, December 8, 1989; 246(4935): 1232 - 1233.
[PDF]

Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
N. D. Weinstein, M.L. Klotz, and P. M. Sandman
Promoting Remedial Response to the Risk of Radon: Are Information Campaigns Enough?
Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 1989; 14(4): 360 - 379.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Public Health Association