AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 78, Issue 5 557-561, Copyright © 1988 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Freimuth, V S
Right arrow Articles by Stein, J A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Freimuth, V S
Right arrow Articles by Stein, J A
Health advertising: prevention for profit.

V S Freimuth, S L Hammond and J A Stein

Department of Communication Arts and Theatre, University of Maryland, College Park 20742.

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) estimates on the basis of current knowledge alone that, at a minimum, 30,000 lives could be saved in the year 2000 if Americans would modify their dietary habits. A recent innovative way of responding to this challenge was the Kellogg Company/NCI All-Bran advertising campaign. This paper will describe the campaign, and its impact on consumers, cereal industry sales, food industry advertising practices, health regulatory policy, and the organizational credibility of both NCI and Kellogg. For the past three years, Kellogg has included NCI's cancer prevention messages in their advertisements for All-Bran cereal and on their bran cereal boxes. This collaborative effort has stimulated considerable controversy over whether the health claims made on the cereal label are in violation of federal food labeling regulations. Meanwhile, research has demonstrated the positive impact of the campaign on consumer's knowledge and behavior regarding fiber as well as on Kellogg's profits. Other manufacturers are anxious to jump on the "branwagon"; however, many unanswered questions remain about this new approach to health advertising.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
K. Glanz, B. Lankenau, S. Foerster, S. Temple, R. Mullis, and T. Schmid
Environmental and Policy Approaches to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Through Nutrition: Opportunities for State and Local Action
Health Educ Behav, November 1, 1995; 22(4): 512 - 527.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
K. Glanz, R. E. Patterson, A. R. Kristal, C. C. DiClemente, J. Heimendinger, L. Linnan, and D. F. McLerran
Stages of Change in Adopting Healthy Diets: Fat, Fiber, and Correlates of Nutrient Intake
Health Educ Behav, December 1, 1994; 21(4): 499 - 519.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
P. L. Havlicek and L. Olson
Health Education in Medical Group Practices: Promoting Health or Business?
Health Educ Behav, January 1, 1990; 17(2): 129 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Public Health Association