AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 78, Issue 5 526-533, Copyright © 1988 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feigl, P
Right arrow Articles by Chu, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feigl, P
Right arrow Articles by Chu, J
Studying patterns of cancer care: how useful is the medical record?

P Feigl, G Glaefke, L Ford, P Diehr and J Chu

Fred Hutchinson Research Center, Seattle, WA 98104.

Records of hospital inpatients were abstracted for 5,000 newly diagnosed cancer patients admitted in 1982-83 to 17 Comprehensive Cancer Centers and 17 Community Hospital Oncology Programs. Generally available data items (silent record rate less than 5 per cent for the typical institution) included: age, race, sex, dates of hospitalization, zip code of residence, pathological stage, dates of biopsy and surgery, numbers of nodes examined and positive, certain diagnostic procedures, and some radiotherapy descriptors. For other data items, there was enormous variability in completeness and high institution-to-institution variation. Record completeness did not differ consistently between comprehensive and community cancer centers. We conclude that the hospital patient record is useful for tracking the frequency of surgical and related events. However, studies of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures should not rely solely on the hospital medical record due to the high rates of silent records.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. H. Rauscher, T. P. Johnson, Y. I. Cho, and J. A. Walk
Accuracy of Self-Reported Cancer-Screening Histories: A Meta-analysis
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 748 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
D. M. Steinwachs, M. E. Stuart, S. Scholle, B. Starfield, M. H. Fox, and J. P. Weiner
A Comparison of Ambulatory Medicaid Claims to Medical Records: A Reliabiligy Assessment
American Journal of Medical Quality, June 1, 1998; 13(2): 63 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Public Health Association