HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Soames Job, R F Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Soames Job, R F

Effective and ineffective use of fear in health promotion campaigns.

R F Soames Job

Psychology Department, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Health promotion campaigns are typically designed to elicit fear, yet the use of fear is often ineffective in achieving the desired behavior change. Campaigns which attempt to use fear as part of a punishment procedure are unlikely to succeed. Consistent with established principles of learning, fear is most likely to be effective if the campaign allows for the desired behavior to be reinforced by a reduction in the level of fear. This entails five requirements: 1) fear onset should occur before the desired behavior is offered; 2) the event upon which the fear is based should appear to be likely; 3) a specific desired behavior should be offered as part of the campaign; 4) the level of fear elicited should only be such that the desired behavior offered is sufficient to substantially reduce the fear; 5) fear offset should occur as a reinforcer for the desired behavior, confirming its effectiveness. Under some circumstances it may be difficult to ensure that these requirements are met. In general, a positive reinforcement approach may prove to be more effective than the use of fear.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. A. C. Ruiter and G. Kok Saying is not (always) doing: cigarette warning labels are useless Eur J Public Health, June 1, 2005; 15(3): 329 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Murphy and P. Bennett Health Psychology and Public Health: Theoretical Possibilities J Health Psychol, January 1, 2004; 9(1): 13 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Coyne-Beasley and R. M. Johnson Gun Storage---Who's the Right Target? Pediatrics, September 1, 2001; 108(3): 823 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Witte and M. Allen A Meta-Analysis of Fear Appeals: Implications for Effective Public Health Campaigns Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2000; 27(5): 591 - 615. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. P. Kimble Cognitive Appraisal and Cardiac Risk Reduction Behavior Following Coronary Angioplasty West J Nurs Res, December 1, 1998; 20(6): 733 - 744. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P Hawe, N McKenzie, and R Scurry Randomised controlled trial of the use of a modified postal reminder card on the uptake of measles vaccination Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 1998; 79(2): 136 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. C. Sinclair, R. R. M. Gershon, L. R. Murphy, and L. M. Goldenhar Operationalizing Theoretical Constructs in Bloodborne Pathogens Training Curriculum Health Educ Behav, May 1, 1996; 23(2): 238 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. DILLARD, C. A. PLOTNICK, L. C. GODBOLD, V. S. FREIMUTH, and T. EDGAR The Multiple Affective Outcomes of AIDS PSAs: Fear Appeals Do More Than Scare People Communication Research, February 1, 1996; 23(1): 44 - 72. [Abstract]

				P Aggleton, K O'Reilly, G Slutkin, and P Davies Risking everything? Risk behavior, behavior change, and AIDS Science, July 15, 1994; 265(5170): 341 - 345. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Freudenberg and U. Trinidad The Role of Community Organizations in AIDS Prevention in Two Latino Communities in New York City Health Educ Behav, July 1, 1992; 19(2): 219 - 232. [Abstract] [PDF]