AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 78, Issue 2 144-147, Copyright © 1988 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kilner, J F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kilner, J F
Selecting patients when resources are limited: a study of US medical directors of kidney dialysis and transplantation facilities.

J F Kilner

University of Kentucky.

This study reports and discusses responses of 453 medical directors of renal dialysis and transplantation facilities to detailed patient selection questionnaires. The questionnaires examine selection criteria being used today as well as those which would be employed were resources to remain or become scarce relative to need. Selection criteria examined (and the number of directors supporting them when resources are limited) are: qualitative prognosis, psychological stability, likelihood of medical benefit, quantitative prognosis, medical benefit (virtually all); willingness, age (very large majority); unique moral duties, disproportionate resources, environment, progress of science, social value (majority); ability to pay, random selection, constituency (very large minority); sex (virtually none). Qualitative prognosis, quantitative prognosis, medical benefit, ability to pay, and especially age are the criteria employed today whose influence would increase if resources are further limited. Some of the ethical implications of various criteria are discussed.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. G. Bostom, J. Selhub, P. F. Jacques, and I. H. Rosenberg
Power Shortage: Clinical Trials Testing the "Homocysteine Hypothesis" against a Background of Folic Acid-Fortified Cereal Grain Flour
Ann Intern Med, July 17, 2001; 135(2): 133 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. G. BOSTOM
Homocysteine: "Expensive Creatinine" or Important,Modifiable Risk Factor for Arteriosclerotic Outcomes in Renal TransplantRecipients?
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2000; 11(1): 149 - 151.
[Full Text]


Home page
Clin Child Psychol PsychiatryHome page
R. J. Shaw and H. N. Taussig
Pediatric Psychiatric Pretransplant Evaluation
Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, July 1, 1999; 4(3): 353 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. M Chandna, J. Schulz, C. Lawrence, R. N Greenwood, and K. Farrington
Is there a rationale for rationing chronic dialysis? A hospital based cohort study of factors affecting survival and morbidity
BMJ, January 23, 1999; 318(7178): 217 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Public Health Association