AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 78, Issue 1 30-33, Copyright © 1988 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopanoff, D E
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopanoff, D E
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M
Recurrent tuberculosis: why do patients develop disease again? A United States Public Health Service cooperative survey.

D E Kopanoff, D E Snider, Jr and M Johnson

Division of Tuberculosis Control, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30333.

In October 1983, a retrospective survey was initiated to determine if patients reported to the Centers for Disease Control as having recurrent tuberculosis truly had recurrent disease and, if so, why they had developed tuberculosis again. Twenty-three health jurisdictions provided information on 800 patients diagnosed as having recurrent tuberculosis during 1981 and 1982. We found that 199 (25 per cent) of the cases did not meet the criteria for recurrent disease. Of the remaining 601 recurrent cases, 20 per cent had no chemotherapy prescribed for their previous episodes of tuberculosis, 20 per cent were prescribed inadequate or inappropriate therapy, and 33 per cent were not compliant with their prescribed therapy regimens. Patients who, during their original episode of tuberculosis, received the major portion of their medical care from physicians in private practice were more compliant than those treated by other health care providers. However, those same patients were more likely to have received inappropriate therapy than patients treated by other providers. Better patient and physician education, closer monitoring, and greater use of preventive therapy and directly observed therapy are necessary to resolve these problems.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
Z. Liu, K. L. Shilkret, and H. M. Ellis
Predictors of Sputum Culture Conversion Among Patients With Tuberculosis in the Era of Tuberculosis Resurgence
Arch Intern Med, May 24, 1999; 159(10): 1110 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. E. Weis, P. C. Slocum, F. X. Blais, B. King, M. Nunn, G. B. Matney, E. Gomez, and B. H. Foresman
The Effect of Directly Observed Therapy on the Rates of Drug Resistance and Relapse in Tuberculosis
N. Engl. J. Med., April 28, 1994; 330(17): 1179 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. F. Gensheimer, I. Joffe, H. L. Israel, T. R. Frieden, and S. W. Dooley
Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis in New York City
N. Engl. J. Med., July 8, 1993; 329(2): 134 - 135.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Public Health Association