|
|
||||||||
We verified a random sample of 50 references in the May 1986 issue of each of three public health journals. Thirty-one per cent of the 150 references had citation errors, one out of 10 being a major error (reference not locatable). Thirty per cent of the references differed from authors' use of them with half being a major error (cited paper not related to author's contention).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Wright and J. S. Armstrong The Ombudsman: Verification of Citations: Fawlty Towers of Knowledge? Interfaces, March 1, 2008; 38(2): 125 - 139. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Aronsky, J. Ransom, and K. Robinson Accuracy of References in Five Biomedical Informatics Journals J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2005; 12(2): 225 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Spivey and S. E. Wilks Reference List Accuracy in Social Work Journals Research on Social Work Practice, July 1, 2004; 14(4): 281 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Turcotte, P. Drolet, and M. Girard Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal: [Le devis de recherche, l'originalite et la coherence generale des manuscrits soumis au Journal influencent leur acceptation ou leur rejet] Can J Anesth, June 1, 2004; 51(6): 549 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. A. Navarro Reference inaccuracy: are articles cited without being read? Journal of Information Science, October 1, 1999; 25(5): 423 - 424. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-M. Coates Writing for Publication: Case Reports J Hum Lact, March 1, 1992; 8(1): 23 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |