HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vedal, S Articles by Speizer, F E Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vedal, S Articles by Speizer, F E

Daily air pollution effects on children's respiratory symptoms and peak expiratory flow.

S Vedal, M B Schenker, A Munoz, J M Samet, S Batterman and F E Speizer

To identify acute respiratory health effects associated with air pollution due to coal combustion, a subgroup of elementary school-aged children was selected from a large cross-sectional study and followed daily for eight months. Children were selected to obtain three equal-sized groups: one without respiratory symptoms, one with symptoms of persistent wheeze, and one with cough or phlegm production but without persistent wheeze. Parents completed a daily diary of symptoms from which illness constellations of upper respiratory illness (URI) and lower respiratory illness (LRI) and the symptom of wheeze were derived. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was measured daily for nine consecutive weeks during the eight-month study period. Maximum hourly concentrations of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and coefficient of haze for each 24-hour period, as well as minimum hourly temperature, were correlated with daily URI, LRI, wheeze, and PEFR using multiple regression models adjusting for illness occurrence or level of PEFR on the immediately preceding day. Respiratory illness on the preceding day was the most important predictor of current illness. A drop in temperature was associated with increased URI and LRI but not with increased wheeze or with a decrease in level of PEFR. No air pollutant was strongly associated with respiratory illness or with level of PEFR, either in the group of children as a whole, or in either of the symptomatic subgroups; the pollutant concentrations observed, however, were uniformly lower than current ambient air quality standards. Moreover, since exposure estimation based on monitoring of ambient air likely results in misclassification of the true exposure, the negative findings of this study must be interpreted cautiously.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. El-Hougeiri and M. El Fadel Correlation of Indoor-Outdoor Air Quality in Urban Areas Indoor and Built Environment, December 1, 2004; 13(6): 421 - 431. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Aekplakorn, D. Loomis, N. Vichit-Vadakan, C. Shy, S. Wongtim, and P. Vitayanon Acute effect of sulphur dioxide from a power plant on pulmonary function of children, Thailand Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2003; 32(5): 854 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C H Linaker, D Coggon, S T Holgate, J Clough, L Josephs, A J Chauhan, and H M Inskip Personal exposure to nitrogen dioxide and risk of airflow obstruction in asthmatic children with upper respiratory infection Thorax, November 1, 2000; 55(11): 930 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. H Linaker, A. J Chauhan, H. M Inskip, S. T Holgate, and D. Coggon Personal exposures of children to nitrogen dioxide relative to concentrations in outdoor air Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2000; 57(7): 472 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text]