HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cook, R J Articles by Maine, D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cook, R J Articles by Maine, D

Spousal veto over family planning services.

R J Cook and D Maine

In many countries a spouse, usually the husband, can veto a partner's use of family planning services. Where spousal veto acts as a barrier to family planning services it represents a serious threat to the lives and health of women and children. Removal of spousal authorization requirements has been shown to increase the use of family planning services. The Family Guidance Association of Ethiopia, for example, removed their requirement in 1982 and clinic utilization increased by 26 per cent within a few months. Courts of several countries have held that spousal veto practices violate principles of personal privacy and autonomy and the right to health care. The effect of such judgements has been to reinforce rights to sexual nondiscrimination found, for example, in national constitutions and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. This article discusses the nature and application of spousal veto practices, explains how such requirements can violate certain human rights, and explores possible remedies to this problem, including ministerial, legislative, and judicial initiatives.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Chamberlain Human Rights Education for Nursing Students Nursing Ethics, May 1, 2001; 8(3): 211 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. L. Heise Reproductive Freedom and Violence against Women: Where Are the Intersections? J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 1993; 21(2): 206 - 216. [PDF]

				R. Holt RU 486/Prostaglandin: Considerations for Appropriate Use in Low-Resource Settings J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 1992; 20(3): 169 - 183. [PDF]