AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 77, Issue 1 45-51, Copyright © 1987 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cadman, D
Right arrow Articles by McNamee, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cadman, D
Right arrow Articles by McNamee, J
Evaluation of public health preschool child developmental screening: the process and outcomes of a community program.

D Cadman, L W Chambers, S D Walter, R Ferguson, N Johnston and J McNamee

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a public health and education screening program aimed at all 4,797 four to five year old children registering for kindergarten in three school districts of southern Ontario, Canada. Children received either the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST) with a community health intervention program for positive screeness; the DDST with no intervention for positive screenees; or no screening test. The intervention program consisted of referral to the child's physician for assessment; a review conference between the child's teacher and the school health nurse; parent counseling; and monitoring of the child in school by the school health nurse. At the end of the third school year, no differences were found between positive screenees in the community health intervention group and the "no intervention" groups using individual academic achievement, cognitive, and developmental tests. Parents' reports revealed no differences between groups in children's mental, social, and behavioral well-being. However, parents of intervention program children had more worry about their child's school progress suggesting a potentially harmful labeling effect. In comparison to a random sample of children with normal DDST results, or a random sample of children who had randomly not been screened, the children with positive preschool DDSTs had substantially more school problems three years after screening.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
C. Dietz, S. H. N. Swinkels, E. van Daalen, H. van Engeland, and J. K. Buitelaar
Parental Compliance After Screening Social Development in Toddlers
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, April 1, 2007; 161(4): 363 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. S. Fisher and H. G. Welch
Avoiding the Unintended Consequences of Growth in Medical Care: How Might More Be Worse?
JAMA, February 3, 1999; 281(5): 446 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Public Health Association