AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 76, Issue 3 274-278, Copyright © 1986 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strobino, D M
Right arrow Articles by Baruffi, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strobino, D M
Right arrow Articles by Baruffi, G
The impact of the Mississippi Improved Child Health Project on prenatal care and low birthweight.

D M Strobino, G A Chase, Y J Kim, B E Crawley, J H Salim and G Baruffi

A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control group design was used to evaluate the Improved Child Health Projects in northwest Mississippi (ICHP1 and ICHP2). Control counties were selected for each project that on average were similar to ICHP counties on racial composition, median family income in 1970 and 1980, and number of births in 1978-79. The study population comprised all resident births in the ICHP and control counties during a pre-ICHP period (1975-78) and the ICHP period (1979-81). The percentage of women with adequate prenatal care rose between the two periods for all counties; the rise was greater for the study than for the control counties for ICHP1; the reverse was found for ICHP2. For both projects, the low birthweight rate remained constant in the pre-ICHP and ICHP periods for the study and control counties. Adjustment for changes in the childbearing characteristics between the two periods did not alter these results. Community involvement in its development and coordination may explain ICHP1's impressive rise in the use of prenatal care.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
M. C. McCormick, L. W. Deal, B. L. Devaney, D. Chu, L. Moreno, and K. T. Raykovich
The Impact on Clients of a Community-Based Infant Mortality Reduction Program: The National Healthy Start Program Survey of Postpartum Women
Am J Public Health, December 1, 2001; 91(12): 1975 - 1977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Huntington and F. A. Connell
For Every Dollar Spent -- The Cost-Savings Argument for Prenatal Care
N. Engl. J. Med., November 10, 1994; 331(19): 1303 - 1307.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Public Health Association