AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 76, Issue 1 71-73, Copyright © 1986 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McTiernan, A
Right arrow Articles by Daling, J R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McTiernan, A
Right arrow Articles by Daling, J R
Bias resulting from using the card-back system to contact patients in an epidemiologic study.

A McTiernan, N S Weiss and J R Daling

In a case-control study of thyroid cancer in women in western Washington, the card-back system was used to contact patients. Demographic characteristics and reproductive history of 124 cases who returned a card and 35 who did not were compared, and were found to differ with respect to various reproductive and demographic factors. Relative risk estimates for various thyroid cancer risk factors were calculated two ways: including as cases only those who returned a card, and including all cases; these estimates differed for some risk factors. The results suggest that the use of the card-back system may result in a low level of response which can lead to biased study results.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1986 by the American Public Health Association