HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McLaughlin, C P Articles by Sheps, C G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by McLaughlin, C P Articles by Sheps, C G

An evaluation of subsidized rural primary care programs: IV. Impact of the rural hospital on clinic self-sufficiency.

C P McLaughlin, T C Ricketts, D A Freund and C G Sheps

Subsidized rural clinics and providers have long depended on the rural hospital for the care of some of their patients; the hospital has also been a source of revenue for these providers and programs. We studied a representative national sample of 116 subsidized rural clinics, focusing on the impact on rural clinic costs and revenues of the use of the hospital by the clinics' providers. Both clinic costs and revenue are reduced by the use of the hospital by rural practice providers, but costs are lowered to a greater extent than revenues, thereby enhancing the financial self-sufficiency of the subsidized clinic. The cost savings affect all aspects of clinic operation, but especially laboratory costs, community services costs, and administrative costs. The dependence of these rural clinics on the hospital indicates that the condition of subsidized rural clinics would be worsened by decreased availability of hospital services.