AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 75, Issue 4 382-391, Copyright © 1985 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S P
Right arrow Articles by Graves, R C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klein, S P
Right arrow Articles by Graves, R C
The cost and effectiveness of school-based preventive dental care.

S P Klein, H M Bohannan, R M Bell, J A Disney, C B Foch and R C Graves

The National Preventive Dentistry Demonstration Program assessed the cost and effectiveness of various types and combinations of school-based preventive dental care procedures. The program involved 20,052 first, second, and fifth graders from five fluoridated and five nonfluoridated communities. These children were examined at baseline and assigned to one of six treatment regimens. Four years later, 9,566 members of this group were examined again. Analyses of their dental examination data showed that dental health lessons, brushing and flossing, fluoride tablets and mouthrinsing, and professionally applied topical fluorides were not effective in reducing a substantial amount of dental decay, even when all of these procedures were used together. Occlusal sealants prevented one to two carious surfaces in four years. Children who were especially susceptible to decay did not benefit appreciably more from any of the preventive measures than did children in general. Annual direct per capita costs were $23 for sealant or fluoride prophy/gel applications and $3.29 for fluoride mouthrinsing. Communal water fluoridation was reaffirmed as the most cost-effective means of reducing tooth decay in children.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
R. Niederman, E. Gould, J. Soncini, M. Tavares, V. Osborn, and J. M. Goodson
A Model for Extending the Reach of the Traditional Dental Practice: The ForsythKids Program
J Am Dent Assoc, August 1, 2008; 139(8): 1040 - 1050.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Adv. Dent. Res.Home page
J.V. Kumar
Is Water Fluoridation Still Necessary?
Adv. Dent. Res., July 1, 2008; 20(1): 8 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
S. O. Griffin, K. Jones, S. K. Gray, D. M. Malvitz, and B. F. Gooch
Exploring Four-Handed Delivery and Retention of Resin-Based Sealants
J Am Dent Assoc, March 1, 2008; 139(3): 281 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S.O. Griffin, P.M. Griffin, B.F. Gooch, and L.K. Barker
Comparing the Costs of Three Sealant Delivery Strategies
J. Dent. Res., September 1, 2002; 81(9): 641 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Public Health Association