AJPH
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 75, Issue 3 246-253, Copyright © 1985 by American Public Health Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, E
Right arrow Articles by Guild, P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Siegel, E
Right arrow Articles by Guild, P
A controlled evaluation of rural regional perinatal care: impact on mortality and morbidity.

E Siegel, D Gillings, S Campbell and P Guild

The impact of a rural regional perinatal care (RPC) program was assessed by a quasi-experimental, controlled, population-based design. Outcome measures included changes in five-year average fetal and neonatal mortality rates as well as short-term obstetric and newborn morbidity. Declines in fetal and neonatal as well as birthweight specific mortality rates were observed for both pilot and control regions, for both races, and especially for 1501-2500 g infants. However, comparisons of preprogram (1966-74) and postprogram (1975-80) average yearly changes showed no statistically significant differences between regions. While the incidence of prenatal morbidity was the same for both regions, intrapartum and newborn morbidity significantly favored the pilot region. These results were difficult to interpret. Program relevant implications of the findings in relation to rural RPC in North Carolina are discussed. Specific benefits appeared to be associated with the development of two high-risk maternity clinics and a Level II center capability in the pilot region. The importance of community support and public/private sector cooperation in relation to RPC is noted.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
N Van der Lely, P J C van Marion, J Otto, J A Hazelzet, and H A Buller
Facilities and equipment in district general hospitals in the Netherlands: Are we prepared for the critically ill paediatric patients?
Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 61 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. M. Epstein
Volume and Outcome -- It Is Time to Move Ahead
N. Engl. J. Med., April 11, 2002; 346(15): 1161 - 1164.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
M. B. Mandell
The Effect of Regionalization On Infant and Early Neonatal Mortality: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis
Eval Rev, December 1, 1986; 10(6): 806 - 829.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Public Health Association