|
|
||||||||
We identified two random samples of 216 primary care physicians each. In one sample, we made weekly telephone contact for active hepatitis A (HA) surveillance; in the other, we made no such contact (passive surveillance). Appropriate county health departments were notified whenever we identified a HA case by active surveillance. Active surveillance was associated with a 2.8-fold increase in reported HA cases compared to passive surveillance. The estimated benefit: cost ratio active/passive surveillance was 2.5:1.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Gazarian, K. Williams, E. Elliott, K. Chant, H. Longbottom, C. Mellis, T. Nolan, R K Oates, and A. Ruben Evaluation of a national surveillance unit Arch. Dis. Child., January 1, 1999; 80(1): 21 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |